For decades, federal acquisition professionals and industry have lived with the same paradox: the FAR was designed to enable mission delivery, yet over time it has evolved into a procedural obstacle course with more clauses, more layers, more policy, and more process, often at the expense of speed, participation, and outcomes. The FAR rewrite, formally known as the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) and launched through Executive Order 14275 (Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement) and OMB Memorandum M-25-26, is intended to make federal buying simpler, more accessible, and more aligned with mission needs rather than defaulting to maximum complexity.
Over time, the FAR accumulated layers of policy, procedures, and agency-specific rules that transformed it from a flexible framework into a burdensome system. Layered procedures have slowed procurement, stretched lead times, and complicated even the simplest buys. As a result, many companies see federal acquisition as too costly and slow, reducing competition and access to innovation and emerging technology.
The growing gap between mission urgency and acquisition speed has become untenable. The rewrite elevates speed to a mission requirement, positioning timely procurement as a core pillar of acquisition quality rather than something sacrificed in the name of compliance.
A major driver of the rewrite is the need to strengthen and diversify the industrial base. The current system often favors incumbents, signaling that success requires insider knowledge and patience with lengthy processes. The reform aims to make government an accessible customer by reducing documentation burdens, aligning with commercial norms, and simplifying access to common vehicles.
The goal is to broaden participation, especially from small businesses, startups, and non‑traditional vendors, and treat supplier diversity as a strategic asset. Expanding who can participate is reframed as an investment in mission agility, innovation, and national competitiveness.
The rewrite also tackles the inefficiency created by decentralized buying. Agencies have built duplicative contract vehicles, weakening buying power and creating inconsistent terms that complicate vendor participation.
The overhaul is being implemented on two tracks: Track 1 rewrites the FAR in plain language and removes non-statutory content, deployed through class deviations rather than a single recodified regulation. Track 2 develops non-regulatory buying guides, practitioner resources, and technology-enabled tools. A new FAR Section 1.109 introduces a four-year review and sunset mechanism for non-statutory FAR provisions unless renewed by the FAR Council. This mechanism is intended to prevent future regulatory accumulation. The FAR Council has identified hundreds of non-statutory requirements for removal or streamlining, with additional reductions under review.
The rewrite shifts federal acquisition away from rigid, procedure-driven execution toward empowered professional judgment. The revised FAR Part 1 states that Contracting Officers (COs) must have authority to the maximum extent practicable, to determine how and when to apply rules on a specific contract, and that COs have wide latitude to exercise business judgment. The intent is less reliance on templates and checklists in favor of informed decision making supported by more clearly articulated frameworks and shared services.
This approach reframes quality as defensible, timely decisions rather than exhaustive paperwork and represents a major cultural change after years of equating compliance with risk avoidance. If implemented effectively, this shift should shorten cycle times and direct effort toward mission outcomes.
The new FAR emphasizes governmentwide buying for widely used goods and services. GSA’s OneGov strategy focuses on consolidating vehicles like the Multiple Award Schedule, while the broader Strategic Acquisition Guidance (SAG) framework, combining the streamlined FAR with OFPP-endorsed buying guides, sets the overarching direction. Together, they enable agencies to use shared terms, pricing, and contract vehicles instead of building duplicative ones.
This consolidation is especially focused on categories like enterprise software, cloud, AI-related services, and other emerging technologies. The default becomes use the shared solution unless a mission-specific need justifies an exception. Industry should expect more standardized terms, category management strategies, and pressure to avoid bespoke approaches.
The rewrite strengthens a commercial-first posture, encouraging agencies to buy commercial products and services with minimal customization. The new FAR Part 10, Section 10.001(f) establishes a priority order requiring agencies to first check whether a commercial product on an existing government-wide contract can meet the need. FAR Part 12 now allows simplified procedures for commercial items, consistent with current statutory and regulatory limits. Goals include faster acquisition, reduced reinvention, and easier participation for vendors who operate on commercial cycles.
This approach favors simpler solicitation requirements and alignment with commercial buying practices. It also broadens the range of available solutions by avoiding custom development, helping agencies keep pace with rapidly evolving technologies.
The real challenge lies in readiness. The shift from rules-based execution to professional judgment is only as strong as the workforce’s ability to exercise that judgment. Agencies with high CO turnover, understaffed shops, or heavy reliance on junior staff face a fundamentally different implementation challenge than well-resourced ones. Workforce capacity, training, and change management, are prerequisites, not afterthoughts. Most critically, agencies must overhaul their supplements. OMB M-25-26 already requires agencies to revise and streamline FAR supplements and provide quarterly progress reports to OFPP, a meaningful enforcement mechanism. If agencies leave their supplements bloated or simply recreate the FAR at the local level, the rewrite becomes a paper victory. Leaders should treat supplement reduction as the true battlefield of implementation.
The FAR rewrite will ultimately be judged not by the elegance of its language, but by what changes on the ground. Real reform shows up in how agencies behave, how decisions get made, and how quickly capabilities reach the mission. The following indicators are the practical, observable signals that reveal whether the shift is taking hold or whether the system is quietly reverting to old habits.
Supplements have grown to rival the FAR, adding layers of unique clauses, approvals, and delays. Agencies are now expected to align with the revised FAR and strip out unnecessary policy. If supplements stay bloated, reform stalls.
Watch for:
Expanded Contracting Officer (CO) discretion only matters if COs feel supported when they use their authority.
Watch for:
Consolidation can lower costs, but over-consolidation risks shrinking competition.
Watch for:
Governance is the wildcard in how firmly OMB and GSA push agencies toward shared solutions.
Watch for:
Industry is being invited to surface inconsistencies and practical gaps; Acquisition.gov is positioned as the hub.
Watch for:
Agencies are exploring AI tools even as protests increasingly include inaccurate or fabricated citations, in some cases attributed to unverified AI use. Integrity is now a frontline concern. This concern is not hypothetical: GAO has dismissed protests where filings relied on unsupported allegations or erroneous citations, reinforcing that submissions must be independently verified and factually grounded.
Watch for:
The FAR rewrite is best understood as a cultural and operational reset with three big goals:
Success won’t be measured by the rewritten FAR alone. The real proof will be in implementation: slimmer supplements, real practitioner discretion, smart consolidation, and modern integrity safeguards. These are the indicators that show whether reform is taking hold and whether the federal acquisition system is genuinely shifting direction.
Part 2: What the FAR Rewrite Signals for Industry Growth Strategies
Part 3: How the FAR Rewrite Is Changing the Federal Acquisition Workforce
Acquisition reform is reshaping how agencies buy. Red Team helps contractors realign through vehicle strategy, capture and proposal optimization, and targeted training. If you’re reassessing your growth posture in light of the FAR rewrite, let’s start the conversation.